Tender comparison, letting schedules, subbie chase-ups and design coordination. It sits on top of Procore instead of replacing it.
| scope item | unit | Kellow Str. | Vantage | Norwest | Ardent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supply & install — N32 slab | m³ | $284.00 | $271.50 | $296.00 | $268.90 |
| Reinforcement (placed) | t | $3,180 | $3,340 | $3,090 | $3,410 |
| Formwork — vertical | m² | $96.00 | $102.40 | $94.20 | $99.75 |
| Pump hire & standby | day | $1,420 | incl. | $1,510 | incl. |
| Package total | $1.284m | $1.311m | $1.276m | $1.263m |
One package at a time, in a spreadsheet built from scratch each round.
None of this is a Procore problem. It is the work that falls between your software.
The system tracks what is out, who has it and when it is due. Pulled from your existing schedule, not entered twice.
Quotes arrive as PDFs, including the printed and scanned ones. They get read, normalised and lined up against your scope.
Apples to apples on rates, with exclusions and qualifications flagged. Your CA verifies it instead of building it.
Approval pack assembled, subcontract drafted, and the letting schedule updates itself.
Costs you a week of CA time every month, and the packages you did not get to.
Salary, super, onboarding, and they inherit the same spreadsheet.
Subscription, migration, retraining, and the work still leaks into Excel.
Youhavealreadyboughtthesoftware.
Comparing tender packages by hand at 45 minutes each. Their contract administrator now verifies a comparison in under 10 minutes.
Running Procore, SharePoint, ClickUp and Monday, with design coordination happening in none of them.
A builder whose subcontractors print the tender, mark it up by hand, and scan it back. Those returns now get read and lined up in the same comparison as the clean PDFs.
Client names withheld. Happy to walk you through the detail on a call.
We take three builds a quarter so each one gets built properly. Book a working session and we will map your procurement process end to end, whether or not you work with us.